🔗 Share this article

The number of reserved seats for Māori representatives on New Zealand councils is set to be cut by over 50%, after a divisive law change that forced municipal councils to put the future of hard-earned Indigenous wards to a popular referendum.

Background Information on Indigenous Representation

Māori wards, which may have multiple councillors based on local population numbers, were established in 2001 to provide Indigenous voters the choice to vote for a assured Māori representative in municipal and provincial governments. Initially, councils could only create a Māori ward by initially putting it to a public vote in their area. Local populations often devoted considerable time building local support and urging their councils to establish Māori wards.

Policy Changes and Administrative Decisions

To remedy the issue, the former administration permitted local councils to establish a Indigenous seat without first requiring them to subject it to a public vote.

However, this year, the right-wing coalition government reversed the change, stating local residents should decide whether to introduce Māori wards.

Voting Outcomes

The new legislation mandated local authorities that had established a electoral district under the previous policy to conduct decisive public votes alongside the municipal polls, which ended on October 11. Of 42 councils participating in the public vote, 17 voted to retain their seats, and 25 to disestablish theirs – revealing many regions against guaranteed Māori representation.

These outcomes represented “a vital step in reinstating community self-determination.”

Critics however have criticised the new policy as “racist” and “anti-Māori”. After assuming power, the current administration has implemented sweeping rollbacks to policies designed to enhance Māori health, wellbeing and representation. Officials has stated it aims to terminate “ethnic-specific” approaches, and asserts it is committed to improving outcomes for Indigenous people and all New Zealanders.

Urban-Rural Divide

The results of the referendums were divided down urban-rural lines – most urban centers mandated to hold referendums supported Indigenous seats, while rural regions skewed heavily towards removing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Indigenous seats that had only just come in – they’re just beginning to hit their stride.”

Voter Turnout and Concerns

This year’s municipal polls recorded the lowest voter turnout in 36 years, with under one-third of eligible voters casting a vote, prompting demands for reform.

The process had been “a mockery”.

Differential Standards

Councils are permitted to establish other types of electoral districts – such as rural wards – without initially mandating a public vote. The disparate requirements applied to Māori wards indicated the administration was singling out Indigenous inclusion.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Numerous localities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This statement referred to the 17 regions that voted to retain their seats.